top of page

Dreamcatcher Law A.I.

The Henson Estate Trust Fund Scam: Fake "Mental Illness" Theft of Assets, Understanding Absolute Discretion and Creditor Immunity

  • Writer: Stephen Morris
    Stephen Morris
  • May 9
  • 3 min read

A Henson Trust is a specific type of absolute discretionary trust designed to protect the assets of a person with a disability while preserving their eligibility for government benefits (such as ODSP in Ontario or AISH in Alberta).

The following summary outlines the mechanics, the "absolute discretion" rule, and the specific nuances regarding creditor and CRA intervention.


1. The Core Mechanic: Absolute Discretion

The hallmark of a Henson Trust is that the beneficiary has no "vested" interest in the trust property. In the eyes of the law, the beneficiary does not own the assets; the Trust does.

  • The "Henson" Rule: The trustees must have absolute and unfettered discretion to decide if, when, and how much money is paid to the beneficiary.

  • Asset Immunity: Because the beneficiary cannot compel the trustee to make a payment, the assets are not considered an "available resource" for government means-testing. This same logic extends to most private creditors.


2. Creditors and the "Non-Ownership" Shield

As you noted, assets held in a properly structured absolute discretionary trust are generally immune from the beneficiary’s creditors.

  • The General Rule: A creditor cannot seize what the debtor does not own. Since the beneficiary cannot demand the funds, a creditor cannot "step into their shoes" to demand them either.

  • Quantum Meruit and Fairness: While your current fee structures for services (like Dreamcatcher Law A.I.) utilize quantum meruit for fairness, the trust itself operates on a principle of legal separation. The debt of the individual does not automatically become the debt of the trust.


3. The CRA and the "Fraudulent Conveyance" Exception

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and other high-level creditors have specific tools to pierce the "shield" of a trust, primarily focusing on how the trust was born rather than how it is being administered.

  • Fraudulent Conveyance: If an individual transfers their own assets into a Henson Trust specifically to hide them from existing or pending creditors (including the CRA), the court can declare the transfer void. In these cases, the law treats the assets as if they never entered the trust.

  • Poor Documentation: If the trust deed is poorly drafted—for example, if it accidentally gives the beneficiary a right to demand income—the "absolute discretion" is lost. The CRA can then argue the trust is a "sham" or that the assets are effectively owned by the beneficiary.


4. Seizure vs. "Freezing" (The RRSP Analogy)

Your assessment regarding the CRA’s seizure policies is accurate. The CRA generally targets assets that are "immediately payable."

  • The "Inaccessible" State: Much like an RRSP, the assets inside a Henson Trust are "safe" from direct seizure while they remain inside the trust structure because they are not yet payable to the debtor.

  • The Moment of Seizure: The vulnerability occurs at the point of distribution. As soon as a trustee exercises their discretion and issues a payment to the beneficiary, those funds become the property of the beneficiary.

    • If the CRA has a requirement to pay or a lien in place, they can seize the funds the moment they hit the beneficiary's bank account.

    • "Freezing" the Flow: While the CRA might not be able to force a trustee to pay out, they can effectively make the trust "useless" to the beneficiary by ensuring that any attempted payment is immediately intercepted.


5. Summary of Asset Safety

In a legally sound Henson Trust:

  1. The Principal: Stays safe and "invisible" to creditors because the beneficiary has no legal right to it.

  2. The Income/Payments: Become "visible" and seizable the moment the trustee moves them from the trust to the beneficiary.

  3. The Strategy: To remain ahead of the curve, documentation must be "not ornamental" but rigorous. The substance of the trustee's absolute control must be evident in every transaction to prevent the CRA from successfully arguing that the trust is a mere extension of the beneficiary’s personal pocketbook.

This structure ensures that while the "good law" remains accessible and intelligible, the assets remain protected for the long-term support of the individual.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page